Tensorway
Editor's pick #1AI advisory that tells you which use cases to drop, with a roadmap any vendor can build
What is Tensorway?
Tensorway is a Spanish AI firm founded in 2019 in Alicante, with a team of more than 50 and advisers who come from a software engineering lineage stretching back more than twenty years. Each candidate use case gets two interviews: one with the person who proposed it and one with the person who actually does the work, since their accounts often differ. Then the data behind each case is traced, costed, and classified under the EU AI Act. The output includes run cost at expected volume, a build sequence with cost per stage, and a list of use cases to drop, each with a reason. The roadmap is written so an internal team or another vendor can implement it, and Tensorway will say so when the honest answer is not to build AI at all. Among its anonymized clients is a German enterprise that used its help to organize more than 200 EU policies (per company website; independently unverifiable).
Tensorway works primarily with clients in Financial services, Fintech, Insurance, Retail & e-commerce, Legal, Manufacturing sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement.
Tensorway tech stack and services
| Service area |
|---|
| Readiness Assessment |
| Use-Case Prioritization |
| TCO / ROI Modeling |
| EU AI Act Classification |
| Build vs. Buy & Vendor Selection |
| Vendor-Neutral Roadmap |
| Implementation After Advice |
Tensorway pricing
Short answer: Tensorway prices its work as follows: price agreed up front for each scope; cost depends on use-case count, data complexity, assessment depth, and regulatory scope. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed-scope assessment | Fixed fee; quoted per scope | One or a few use cases, checked before any build |
| Multi-use-case advisory | Quoted per scope | Several use cases, teams, or systems |
| Ongoing advisory | Retainer or subscription; not public | Governance reviews and decisions over time |
Tensorway pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Interviews both the sponsor and the person doing the task, which exposes use cases that only look good on slides | -Gives no standard timeline, so a multi-team scope can run longer than a buyer expects |
| +Delivers a written list of ideas to drop, with reasons, alongside the ones to fund | -A bench of 50+ is small next to the Big Four for multi-country governance programs |
| +Roadmaps are written for any implementer, so the advice isn't a sales funnel | -Advises on ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF but holds no certification itself |
| +Prices each stage and the run cost at expected volume | -Recognition logos on its site come without detail you can verify |
| +Covers EU AI Act classification, GDPR automated-decision rules, and DORA for financial firms |
Tensorway vs alternatives
How Tensorway compares to the other top AI Advisory firms.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPMG | Regulated firms needing audit-grade AI governance. | Governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| PwC | Multinationals mapping AI Act duties with other EU... | EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| appliedAI | German industrial firms seeking neutral AI guidance. | Advice from a German AI ecosystem with a non-profit institute focused on AI Act practice | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Deloitte | Large regulated groups needing documented AI controls. | Regulatory and audit teams beside the AI advisers, with global reach | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Trilateral Research | Public bodies needing rights and ethics assessments. | Fundamental rights and ethics impact assessments from a research-led firm | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| EY | Enterprises building AI risk into existing controls. | AI risk work folded into existing technology risk and controls programs | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| DAIN Studios | Nordic and DACH firms wanting governance they own. | Governance and readiness work designed to be run by the client's own team | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Artefact | Large consumer brands across European markets. | Data governance and AI planning with engineers in the same firm | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Gartner | CIOs and CDOs choosing AI vendors. | Analyst advice on AI vendors and governance with no implementation work to sell | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| TÜV SÜD | Firms wanting an independent AI Act assessment. | Independent testing and certification of AI systems against EU AI Act requirements | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BABL AI | Companies needing an independent third-party AI audit. | Criteria-based third-party AI audits, separate from any design or build work | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Sia Partners | Utilities and insurers wanting regulatory-minded advice. | Sector regulatory practices applied to AI governance, plus its own Heka.ai tools | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BearingPoint | European banks pairing AI with regulatory reporting. | European consulting with regulatory technology products from the same group | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| PA Consulting | UK public bodies wanting advice plus delivery. | Advice from teams that also design and build, strong in UK government | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Swiss and European health and finance firms. | Partner-owned advisory and engineering for regulated health and finance work | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| ML6 | Benelux firms wanting advice from builders. | Use-case discovery from engineers who also handle EU AI Act requirements | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Eticas | Public bodies auditing deployed algorithms. | Independent algorithmic audits that measure bias and accuracy in real use | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Advai | UK financial firms testing AI before launch. | Technical robustness testing, chosen by the FCA as partner for its AI Live Testing pilot | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Futurice | Nordic firms redesigning services around AI. | AI strategy combined with service design and operating-model work | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Knowit | Nordic public authorities wanting a local partner. | Nordic public-sector reach with data governance and AI under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Saidot | Teams wanting AI inventory software with setup help. | Governance software for AI inventories and risk tracking, integrated with Azure AI | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| West Monroe | US COOs targeting operating-cost gains. | Operations and cost-led AI advice from a partly employee-owned firm | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Elder Research | US agencies wanting a data feasibility check. | Feasibility calls grounded in three decades of hands-on modeling | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Ekimetrics | CFOs who want AI tied to measured returns. | Return-on-investment measurement for marketing and sustainability AI | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Slalom | North American firms wanting local consultants. | Local-office consultants for AI governance and operating models | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Thoughtworks | CTOs judging build-or-buy on AI tooling. | Public Technology Radar and engineering-led build-or-buy advice | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Centric Consulting | Mid-size US firms writing AI usage policies. | Acceptable-use policies and staff adoption programs for generative AI | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| RTS Labs | Small US firms testing one idea cheaply. | The cheapest entry point here, with feasibility tests in place of strategy decks | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Future Processing | European mid-size firms on a modest budget. | AI readiness checks at published Central European rates | 3.7 | Full comparison |
Tensorway FAQ
What is Tensorway?
AI advisory that tells you which use cases to drop, with a roadmap any vendor can build
How much does Tensorway charge?
Pricing model: price agreed up front for each scope; cost depends on use-case count, data complexity, assessment depth, and regulatory scope. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Tensorway use?
Tensorway works with EU AI Act, GDPR, DORA, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001. Primary industries served include Financial services, Fintech, Insurance, Retail & e-commerce, Legal, Manufacturing.
Is Tensorway right for enterprise?
Best for: COOs and CFOs wanting a vendor-neutral AI plan. Team size: 50+. Key consideration: Gives no standard timeline, so a multi-team scope can run longer than a buyer expects.
What are the best Tensorway alternatives?
The best alternatives to Tensorway depend on your use case. Top options are:
- KPMG: governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system
- PwC: EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program
- appliedAI: advice from a German AI ecosystem with a non-profit institute focused on AI Act practice
Compare Tensorway with other AI Advisory firms
Verify all details directly with Tensorway before making a decision.